would like to co-author, thanks -Hui
2009/11/30 Yaron Sheffer <yar...@checkpoint.com>: > This draft proposes an IKEv2 extension to allow the setup of an IKE SA with > no Child SA, a situation which is currently disallowed by the protocol. > > Proposed starting point: > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nir-ipsecme-childless-01.txt. > > Please reply to the list: > > - If this proposal is accepted as a WG work item, are you committing to > review multiple versions of the draft? > - Are you willing to contribute text to the draft? > - Would you like to co-author it? > > Please also reply to the list if: > > - You believe this is NOT a reasonable activity for the WG to spend time on. > > If this is the case, please explain your position. Do not explore the fine > technical details (which will change anyway, once the WG gets hold of the > draft); instead explain why this is uninteresting for the WG or for the > industry at large. Also, please mark the title clearly (e.g. "DES40-export in > IPsec - NO!"). > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec > _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
