Hi Interested in coauthoring this draft.
Thanks -ns murthy -----Original Message----- From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 8:49 AM To: ipsec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [IPsec] Proposed work item: Childless IKE SA Yaron Sheffer wrote: > This draft proposes an IKEv2 extension to allow the setup of an IKE SA with no Child SA, a situation which is currently disallowed by the protocol. > > Proposed starting point: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nir-ipsecme-childless-01.txt. > > Please reply to the list: I believe that this is a useful extension to IKEv2. I am willing to review drafts, and I might co-author. In particular, I would like to be able to negotiate IKEv2, specifically so that I can send a DELETE. Alternatively, I would like to negotiate a non-SA for some traffic selector. I mention this, because I'm not sure that the reasons for CHILDLESS are the same for different people, and therefore, we may be trying to use a hammer on a screw. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
