On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Dominic Fandrey <kamik...@bsdforen.de> wrote:
> On 09/03/2010 06:30, Michael Menegakis wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nus...@suse.de> wrote:
>>> So, has anyone tried the new build yet?
>>> http://www.ioquake3.org/files/angst/ioquake3-1.36_SVN1778-18.3.x86_64.exe
>>> http://www.ioquake3.org/files/angst/ioquake3-1.36_SVN1778-15.2.x86.exe
>>
>> This one appears to be working fine
>> http://www.ioquake3.org/files/angst/ioquake3-1.36_SVN1778-19.1.x86_64.exe
>>
>> performance appears to be relatively good too.
>>
>> I don't know why it's not _better_ than the x86 version on windows -
>> it is here when comparing the two on linux - but anyway; probably
>> related to the x64 thing not being as mature on windows yet.
>
> There is considerable overhead in the 64bit VM code. I'd assume that
> this is the reason.

Then why do I see considerable improvement on Linux x86_64? about +20%
FPS on timedemo.
_______________________________________________
ioquake3 mailing list
ioquake3@lists.ioquake.org
http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org
By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.

Reply via email to