On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Dominic Fandrey <kamik...@bsdforen.de> wrote: > On 09/03/2010 06:30, Michael Menegakis wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nus...@suse.de> wrote: >>> So, has anyone tried the new build yet? >>> http://www.ioquake3.org/files/angst/ioquake3-1.36_SVN1778-18.3.x86_64.exe >>> http://www.ioquake3.org/files/angst/ioquake3-1.36_SVN1778-15.2.x86.exe >> >> This one appears to be working fine >> http://www.ioquake3.org/files/angst/ioquake3-1.36_SVN1778-19.1.x86_64.exe >> >> performance appears to be relatively good too. >> >> I don't know why it's not _better_ than the x86 version on windows - >> it is here when comparing the two on linux - but anyway; probably >> related to the x64 thing not being as mature on windows yet. > > There is considerable overhead in the 64bit VM code. I'd assume that > this is the reason.
Then why do I see considerable improvement on Linux x86_64? about +20% FPS on timedemo. _______________________________________________ ioquake3 mailing list ioquake3@lists.ioquake.org http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.