Am 07.11.2017 um 12:53 schrieb Tony Marston:
It should also be obvious to every first year student that if a program contains code that is rarely or never used then carrying around the "weight" of that code has a detrimental effect

but you don#t get the basics right: you need to measure if that effect is significant at all

The code has a bigger footprint, therefore takes up more memory and is slower to load

slower to load don't matter, if the memory overhead is significant needs to be measured

It also increases the burden on those who maintain that code as they have to consider every piece of code without knowing how often it is used.

and *that* is not *your* problem - the whole discussion was about your claim that it has a bad effect for everybody out there

GOD DAMNED: stop to ignore "it can even happen that due the implementation other code paths which would not have been touched otherwise may get optimized due refactoring and the end result can be even faster in general" - that you ignored it multiple times proves that you can't say anything which would not prove your claims about the overall impact wrong

well, you always ignore anything but your opinion and the next step is calling people "except if you are a nit-picking, anal retentive OCD sufferer" because they don't follow your argumentation as it happened in several threads


--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to