Morning Wes, I'm not sure that you justified the inconsistency in error management.
Why shouldn't it throw InvalidArgumentException ? Cheers Joe On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Wes <netmo....@gmail.com> wrote: > Just wanted to save everybody's time. 4 weeks seemed an enormity for that. > But obviously there is no hurry. > > 2016-11-22 21:34 GMT+01:00 Rowan Collins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com>: > > > On 22/11/2016 17:32, Wes wrote: > > > >> Okay. But just for the record, it's about very tiny additions... aren't > 4 > >> weeks for that too much? > >> > > > > If it's calendar time you're worried about, don't sweat it - the RFC > > rightly targets 7.2, which won't be released for almost exactly a year. > So > > even if we started the vote now, and there was a patch ready by the time > it > > closed (there doesn't seem to be one yet?), there'd still be another 50 > > weeks after that before it showed up in a live release. > > > > If you pause for 2 weeks of feedback first, it will be released at > exactly > > the same time, but have 48 weeks in the code base with nobody using it > > instead of 50. :) > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > Rowan Collins > > [IMSoP] > > > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > >
