Just wanted to save everybody's time. 4 weeks seemed an enormity for that. But obviously there is no hurry.
2016-11-22 21:34 GMT+01:00 Rowan Collins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com>: > On 22/11/2016 17:32, Wes wrote: > >> Okay. But just for the record, it's about very tiny additions... aren't 4 >> weeks for that too much? >> > > If it's calendar time you're worried about, don't sweat it - the RFC > rightly targets 7.2, which won't be released for almost exactly a year. So > even if we started the vote now, and there was a patch ready by the time it > closed (there doesn't seem to be one yet?), there'd still be another 50 > weeks after that before it showed up in a live release. > > If you pause for 2 weeks of feedback first, it will be released at exactly > the same time, but have 48 weeks in the code base with nobody using it > instead of 50. :) > > Regards, > > -- > Rowan Collins > [IMSoP] > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
