Okay. But just for the record, it's about very tiny additions... aren't 4 weeks for that too much?
Also, in my defense, I'm not the first doing that. I don't remember exactly but there was a RFC about ext/intl it was put straight to votes as it was about small additions. I'm not a internals programmer myself but I have consulted some and they said proposed features are ok and implementation would be trivial, so I thought it was ok to do this. Sorry for that. (Sorry Stas for the multiple replies) 2016-11-22 18:30 GMT+01:00 Stanislav Malyshev <smalys...@gmail.com>: > Hi! > > > I'm not a internals programmer myself but I have consulted some and they > > said proposed features are ok and implementation would be trivial, so I > > thought it was ok to do this. Sorry for that. > > If proposed features are so trivial that they do not warrant any > discussion, then there's no need for RFC. Part of RFC process is > inviting people to discuss the changes. That's what it for. Jumping > straight to vote is not how it's supposed to work. I don't know if it > happened in the past - it shouldn't have, but if it did, it was wrong > and should not be repeated. > > Minimal discussion period for non-language RFC is one week. Please do > read https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting before proposing votes. It's the > minimum you could do. > > Thanks, > -- > Stas Malyshev > smalys...@gmail.com >
