On 19 November 2016 at 10:45, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2016 11:34 AM, "Joe Watkins" <pthre...@pthreads.org> wrote: > > > > Morning Pierre, > > > > Sorry, but yes. > > > > http://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting > > > > > There'd be a minimum of 2 weeks between when an RFC that touches the > language is brought up on this list and when it's voted on is required. > Other RFCs might use a smaller timeframe, but it should be at least a week. > > Seriously Joe, this is ridiculous. You are forcing a shorter period of time > for something that does affect PHP at a whole. > > Be fair and let anyone raises their feedback. > Ignoring whether this RFC "touches the language" (phrasing I've always taken issue with) and as such *requires* a two-week discussion period. I think this particular RFC should be given two weeks, or longer, for everyone to have their say. Given that it is Thanksgiving next week, for purely practical reasons, I think it necessitates a *longer* discussion period (than one week) as interested parties may simply not be around at all. For a process-related RFC such as this, forcing a one-week discussion period when a large number of folks mightn't even be looking at the list, reads as irresponsible, to me at least. Regards, Peter (who apologises in advance for poking the bear)
