2016-11-17 18:18 GMT+01:00 Joe Watkins <pthre...@pthreads.org>: > Afternoon internals, > > This has been discussed before in various RFC threads, there does seem to > be some consensus that 50%+1 votes could be harmful. > > To what degree, I am not sure. > > I raise for discussion the topic of abolishing 50%+1 votes, and requiring > all changes regardless of their nature to pass by a super majority of > 2/3+1. > > Please read the (brief) RFC and raise objections here. > > There will be a one week discussion period for this RFC. > > Cheers > Joe >
What's the reason for 2/3+1 instead of 2/3? Currently we have 50%+1 or 2/3, but not 2/3+1 as 2/3 is already a majority. Regards, Niklas
