Hi! > Sorry, but yes. > > http://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting > >> There'd be a minimum of 2 weeks between when an RFC that touches the > language is brought up on this list and when it's voted on is required. > Other RFCs might use a smaller timeframe, but it should be at least a week.
I must say I don't understand Joe's position here. Where's the fire? Why can't we afford two-week or three-week discussion? How does it make sense to make a huge change in voting rules after tiniest amount of discussion possible? If anything, we should take as long as it requires for such things, not try to rush it through. I think minimal discussion time is way unadequate for such thing. It's not adding optional argument for an obscure PDO function, it's changing the rules for the whole project. I see absolutely no reason not to let the discussion unfold and be as long as it needs to be. -- Stas Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
