Matt Prelude wrote on 09/02/2016 15:51:
Without the right to face the accuser, the accusation, or a guarantee that all supporting AND contradictory evidence and testimony will be published,
this is a 'secret court' proposal.

Without going into point by point discussion, I think you're conflating several things here:

1) the right of the accused to know *what* they are accused of, which I agree is fundamental 2) the right of the accused to know *who* is doing the accusing, which may be implied by (1), but may also be in conflict with other rights the accuser holds, and have to be balanced against them 3) the right of the public to scrutinise the entire process, including all submissions by both parties

In particular, private mediation between two parties - granting (1) and (2), but withholding (3) - is sometimes the most constructive approach, at least until that mediation breaks down.

Regards,
--
Rowan Collins
[IMSoP]

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to