Matt Prelude wrote on 09/02/2016 15:51:
On 09/02/16 15:24, Rowan Collins wrote:
That said, I am not convinced either
a) that the current process has any guarantee of transparency - who
exactly has the right to block people from the list, or revoke other
karma? what transparent process are they obliged to follow when doing
so?
Here, we agree.
Nowhere in the documents ...
We're talking cross-purposes here. By "current process", I don't mean
the current draft document, I mean your claim that "we already have the
'teeth' to enforce the CoC in borderline cases" - i.e. that there is
already some process, which the proposed document would replace.
With respect, I don't think that disagreeing that there is any need for a
new enforcement process is 'agreeing with' the new RFC.
This thread is not about agreeing with the full Code of Conduct, only
the top-level guidelines here:
https://wiki.php.net/adopt-code-of-conduct/guidelines
While not quite a straw man, the details you are looking into here are
not the current focus of attention.
So, rather than putting words in your mouth, I will ask the question
directly: you say above that you do not agree that there is a need for a
*new* enforcement process, but do you agree that there is a need for the
*old* enforcement process to be recognised as such?
Regards,
--
Rowan Collins
[IMSoP]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
