Here is my reasons for no: 1- Non-intuitive behavior 2- Hard to read code, takes more time to understand underlying logic/flow 3- YAANPI => Yet Another Alternate Named Parameters Implementation (when I look at future scope) 4- Most common usage form (first example) still forces you to type almost same amount of logic with less readability and little value
Regards, On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Joe Watkins <pthre...@pthreads.org> wrote: > Morning internalz, > > As mentioned the future scope stuff is scary, but not enough on it's > own to vote no. > > So I want to vote yes, but I'm just waiting to hear objections from no > voters, in case they thought of something I didn't ... > > Cheers > Joe > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > > > Hi again, > > > > There's been a lot of No votes on this RFC, but I haven't received much > > feedback as to why. Would any of you mind sharing your reasons, if > > possible? It would be helpful if I knew why people have voted against it, > > as then I might be able to modify the RFC to be more palatable, or > > understand where I went wrong. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Andrea Faulds wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> It's been more than two weeks since I first proposed this RFC, and > >> there's no outstanding issues preventing moving towards a vote. There's > >> not yet a language specification patch, but that can be done later. > >> > >> So, I'm opening the vote on this RFC today, 2016-02-05, and it'll close > >> the Sunday after next, 2016-02-14. The vote requires a 2/3 majority as > >> it's a language change. > >> > >> The RFC page is here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/list_keys > >> > >> Happy voting! > >> > > > > > > -- > > Andrea Faulds > > https://ajf.me/ > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > -- Guilherme Blanco MSN: guilhermebla...@hotmail.com GTalk: guilhermeblanco Toronto - ON/Canada