Morning internalz,
As mentioned the future scope stuff is scary, but not enough on it's
own to vote no.
So I want to vote yes, but I'm just waiting to hear objections from no
voters, in case they thought of something I didn't ...
Cheers
Joe
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> There's been a lot of No votes on this RFC, but I haven't received much
> feedback as to why. Would any of you mind sharing your reasons, if
> possible? It would be helpful if I knew why people have voted against it,
> as then I might be able to modify the RFC to be more palatable, or
> understand where I went wrong.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> It's been more than two weeks since I first proposed this RFC, and
>> there's no outstanding issues preventing moving towards a vote. There's
>> not yet a language specification patch, but that can be done later.
>>
>> So, I'm opening the vote on this RFC today, 2016-02-05, and it'll close
>> the Sunday after next, 2016-02-14. The vote requires a 2/3 majority as
>> it's a language change.
>>
>> The RFC page is here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/list_keys
>>
>> Happy voting!
>>
>
>
> --
> Andrea Faulds
> https://ajf.me/
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
