Hi! > I have one idea. I made an awful mistake while drafting the Voting > RFC, requiring a 2/3 majority for language changes. It should have > been 85-90%. When you have a 85-90% majority - it's likely to imply > several things:
I have a feeling that wouldn't help. Instead of "it's toxic because people argue endlessly" it'd be "it's toxic because every time anybody has an idea somebody shows up and shuts it down, so nothing worthy ever gets done" (please don't take it wrong way, I don't say unanimous RFCs are unworthy, that would just be the perception for people whose RFCs gained no support). I.e. if now we have bad reputation and more RFCs passing, with higher barrier we'd have (different) bad reputation and less RFCs passing. I thing that won't be the fix we're looking for. Though we probably would save some time ;) -- Stas Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
