On 03/08/15 00:01, Markus Malkusch wrote: > Anyways, OP was complaining about missing interfaces and features, which is > simply not true. You can communicate through Email, NNTP and if one wants a > webinterface so hardly just wrap one around NNTP. How can it be more > accessible by reducing it to some webinterface only?
Some of the web based forums have attempted to integrate email with the on-line interface. Yahoo groups is an utter pain but I don't have to use any of the web based interface, I just use emails and in the morning there will be a number sitting in inbox so I don't have to scan around a dozen sites to see what is happening. The ones that do send email notifications make a half hearted attempt, but one has to go on line to see the content o post replies. What *IS* needed is a nice cross format system of working, but that only requires adding a preferred web interface to the existing email service? Perhaps then people who seem to prefer top posting will use the web interface and those of us who prefer a private local archive will then simply get the new text ... as an email. There are already web based interfaces but not providing what some people seem to want. What is stopping the development of one of those interfaces into an addition to the existing email channels? No need to MOVE anything! -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
