Hi Zeev, On 11 March 2015 at 18:48, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote:
> Rest assured that if I see that they both seem to be failing as we near the > end of the voting time, I'll retract the Coercive STH RFC - and I'll > actually vote in favor of the dual mode RFC, People sometimes tell me that they think the PHP-Internals list is a toxic environment. I usually defend it, saying that it's not that bad, with people just wanting their view to be considered. However right now it is toxic, with name calling, people being contacted off-list with abusive emails and disputes about the rules of the RFC process during an RFC vote. Zeev, you have the capability of ending this drama by carrying out the promise you made to support the scalar_type_hints_v5 RFC if the Coercive RFC isn't going to pass. It would be healthier for PHP if we didn't have another 10 days of toxicity. The scalar_type_hints_v5 is currently passing, and the Coercive STH RFC is very, very unlikely to pass. Please will you carry out your promise to retract the Coercive RFC and support the other RFC a few days early, so that we can move forward getting PHP 7 ready rather than having this continued toxicity? cheers Dan Ack -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
