Hi, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> writes:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015, Zeev Suraski wrote: > >> The vote on the Coercive Scalar Type Hints is now open for voting. >> >> >> >> The latest version of the RFC includes changes discussed on internals@ last >> week: >> >> 1. Accept string->bool and int->bool conversions (false->bool is not >> supported) >> >> 2. Accept leading/trailing spaces in string->number conversions. > > Aren't you supposed to leave it one week between annoucing the latest > RFC with your changes, and the real vote? I'm reading that the delay is one week after announcing the intent to vote. Which means that the RFC is in final state before voting, and the author has announced intention to vote. I haven't seen the mail announcing this, did I miss it? There were a lot of mails on internals lately, it may be possible. If this mail wasn't sent, should the rules be different because there was a lot of debate on this RFC? Then which other rule should be broken? > > Actually, now I read it, it should actually be two weeks ... but then I > guess it was just a tweak on an earlier version: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting#discussion_period I guess that since there was a lot of discussion, shortening to one week makes sense. > > cheers, > Derick Cheers, -- Florian Margaine
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
