On 02/20/2015 10:52 AM, Josh Watzman wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2015, at 10:30 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com> wrote:
>> Hack examples all using <?hh // strict
>>
>> echo number_format('1000');
>> echo htmlspecialchars(1000);
>> echo md5(1000);
>>
>> These are all fine both as far as the type-checker is concerned as well
>> as the runtime, of course, but they are runtime fatals in your proposed RFC.\
>
> And they should be errors in Hack too. The reason they aren't are to ease
> transitions from PHP to Hack. I'd expect them to be more strongly typed
> eventually.Right, you are doing a gradual transition of an API that wasn't written to be strict. It was written with the assumption that type coercion would take place. If there is a good reason to ease the transition from PHP to Hack there is an even stronger reason to ease the transition from PHP to PHP. -Rasmus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
