Le 16/02/2015 23:50, François Laupretre a écrit :
So, IMO, the RFC is dead, whatever 2/3 or 3/4 we may have.
Once it was clear that both camps would never agree, with every PHP
founders against it, pushing it was useless. We're not electing a
president, we're trying to ensure we make the right decision. The
spirit is not the same.
Hi,
Does it mean that in your mind the founders of the PHP language
(basically Rasmus/Zeev/Andy) have a veto right on any RFC just because
they are the founders, like in a company with shareholders? If out of
100 votes for a feature, 97 were pro but the 3 founders votes were
against then the RFC is moot? What about the voters that have been
actively making PHP alive in the last 4 years and that have more commits
in PHP than the founders themselves? Their opinion is of less value than
the founders' just for historical reasons? Do you really think the new
developers that arrived in the last years (and yes Andrea was one of
them) are less skilled, less clever and have less vision than the
founders had 15 years ago?
I think your reasoning is flawed, sorry :)
Regards
Pascal Chevrel
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
