Le Tue, 17 Feb 2015 00:58:18 +0100, Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> a écrit:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:50 PM, François Laupretre <franc...@php.net>
wrote:
Once again, anyone can take over version 0.3, if it is so great. Why
don't you do it ?
I will play the game, stop working on my proposal, and vote 'yes' again.
But don't ask me to do it in your place.
If nobody else does it, I will.
I think Andrea's 0.3 proposal was extremely well balanced, served
everyone's needs whether they would admit it or not, and who's only
failing (subjectively termed) was the use of declare(). I think
declare() is fine and not nearly as ugly as some have slandered it to
be, but I'm willing to read the winds and modify it for v0.4.
Straw poll:
1) <?php strict;
2) <?php-strict
3) use strict; (psuedo-namespace)
3) <?php // strict (I don't actually like HHVM's style, but if you do...)
4) declare(strict=true); (As a top-level declare only)
5) declare(strict=true); (exactly as in v0.3 -- maybe you liked it)
6) your write-in vote here
I'm not going to scope in union types, nullables, or falsables. We
can leave that for a followup RFC, this one is contentious enough as
it is.
-Sara
I like 2) No possible confusion, and it's a clear tag.
But implementing 3) would be a good thing, since it is Hack syntax. Even
if I don't like to use comments to enable something.
If we have 2 similar features between PHP and Hack, I think it should have
the same syntax, so there are minimum BC from one language to another, and
people would spend less time to remember which syntax is the right syntax
for PHP or Hack.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
