We don't use macros with variable number of arguments in PHP.
this is not portable.

Thanks. Dmitry.

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:01 PM, reeze <re...@php.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 11 February 2015 at 19:15, Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't think it'll improve something, and may complicate merging from
>> PHP5 (this is not a big issue, because merging is already not simple).
>>
>>
> Yes it just makes code looks a little better and cleaner.
>
> I didn't realized the merging problem. that might affect diffs  which
> changes php_error_docref()
>
>
>> In any case, the names should be swapped, to be used as:
>>
>>     php_error_docref(E_WARNING, "recursion detected");
>>
>> or
>>
>>     php_error_docref_ex(NULL, E_WARNING, "recursion detected");
>>
>
> Yes I prefer this too.
>
> But considering the merging problem, I think I should hold this idea of
> update all of those calls.
>
> We may provider a simple version with default null docref for external
> extesions, but I didn't have proper name for that.
>
>
>>
>>
>> also macros with __VA_ARGS__ may be not portable, s it should be
>> implemented differently.
>>
>
> Yes I should use ##__VA_ARGS__  instead.
>
>
>> Thanks. Dmitry.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Xinchen Hui <larue...@php.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohg...@ohgaki.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:21 PM, reeze <re...@php.net> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I think it is a cleanup, it works but there are too many duplication.
>>> it
>>> >> is the time to make the code clean and easier to understand.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I've never used other than NULL also.
>>> > Everyone is going to remove TSRM macros, it's right time to clean up.
>>> fine, if you want to change..
>>>
>>> please, _ex means extending,
>>>
>>> so the name should not be php_error_docref_ex...
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Yasuo Ohgaki
>>> > yohg...@ohgaki.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Xinchen Hui
>>> @Laruence
>>> http://www.laruence.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Reeze Xia
> http://reeze.cn
>

Reply via email to