On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote: > > proposal everyone can rally behind, it very clearly failed. We didn't have > to wait for a vote by the way, it was clear from the discussion on > internals@. > Controversial RFCs are precisely the ones that SHOULD be voted on. Policy states that 2/3s means consensus on core language changes. The current 63.5% isn't too far from that. Just curious, but do you have a different number in mind for this vote? 90%? 80%?
-- Matthew Leverton -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
