On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Pavel Kouřil <pajou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> I am not saying I want one or the other (I have voted and now only >> focus on solving possible tech issues we may find) but trying to be >> fair with Andrea's RFC and amazing effort: >> >> What you ask is basically part of the RFC already, your code can be >> strict free if you wish to, or it will be by default. Only issue is >> the massive misunderstanding behind the declare(strict) thing. >> >> Cheers, >> Pierre > > I'm not saying one or the other - I mean two votes, one for the > "basic" weak typing and if it passes, then vote for adding the > declareable optional strict typing. Now it is unfortunately "both or > neither".
because you have both already. Your code is not affected unless you use strict=1, even if the libs your code relies on actually use strict=1. In other words, this RFC proposes both worlds in one shot. I see the votes for two as redundant or killing the root idea behind this RFC. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
