On 08/02/2015 23:24, Zeev Suraski wrote:
There's zero or virtually zero controversy surrounding the weak typing RFC, the one that was v0.1. The controversy wasn't (and isn't) about what was in v0.1, but rather, about what wasn't in there, namely, strict typing; Not in the contents of the v0.1 RFC itself, which, again, had zero controversy around and is effectively being voted on as an integral part of the current RFC. You have virtually all of the supporters of strict typing voting in favor of the current RFC, also voting in favor of the v0.1 elements which are an integral part of it.
By this logic, the current proposal also does not take anything away from weak-typing proponents (which I guess I am a part of FWIW). It lets everyone be happy in their corner.
I don't see how this is worse than one side winning by ignoring the other. Cheers -- Jordi Boggiano @seldaek - http://nelm.io/jordi -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
