On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Anatol Belski <anatol....@belski.net> > wrote: > >> Hi Hui, >> >> On Tue, January 27, 2015 13:32, Xinchen Hui wrote: >> > Hey: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Anatol Belski <anatol....@belski.net> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, January 19, 2015 18:04, Anatol Belski wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> I think the research on >> >>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/removal_of_dead_sapis_and_exts is now far >> >>> enough to be discussed. >> >>> >> >>> So far I only could not test sapi/nsapi because it needs a >> >>> SunOs/IPlanet. >> >>> But independent from that, it'd make sense someone to recheck my >> >>> perceptions, or just the areas one is interested in. >> >>> >> >>> Also hereby I'm calling the authors/maintainers of the corresponding >> >>> units to give the info about their intentions. >> >>> >> >>> Lets think about it, anyway. Maybe I've missed some extension yet, >> >>> then that were a chance to add it to the RFC. >> >>> >> >> >> >> thanks' for the feedback so far. I've changed the title now to >> >> >> >> "Removal of dead or not yet PHP7 ported SAPIs and extensions" >> >> >> >> >> >> Also extended the RFC with the information we've got so far - added the >> >> extensions suggested by Dmitry and the feedback arrived inbetween. >> >> >> >> Please check this again, I plan to start the vote on this next week. >> >> >> > removing extensions is okey, since they can goes to PECL >> > >> > but for SAPIs, where it can go... :< >> > >> They wouldn't have to go anywhere if they were supported well. With SAPIs >> - many of the servers are either very old or don't support the SAPI >> module. Thus porting those SAPIs, even if there were some willing, >> wouldn't make not much sense (well, maybe for the learning fun). >> >> Where should they go - I'd say nowhere. Extensions as well. The removal >> should be tagged as any other RFC patch. Then it can be picked from the >> tag by the persons ready/willing to maintain them, and taken into PECL or >> ported to PHP7 and included again. Depending on the vote results of >> course. >> >> Regards >> >> Anatol >> >> > what laruence is trying to say that we don't really have a syberia for > SAPIs as we have for exts(pecl), but given how these SAPIs are not > maintained/compatible with PHP7, I don't think that it is a blocker problem. > just maybe something we could improve with the future (would also make it > easier to develop SAPIs supporting multiple php versions for example > opcache and phpdbg, currently those are a bit PITA for the maintainers). > sorry, for the confusion, ofc. opcache isn't a SAPI, but it is also provided as a pecl extension for php < 5.5, so while it is still a PITA for the devs, is unrelated to the topic of SAPIs. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
