On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Anatol Belski <anatol....@belski.net> wrote:
> Hi Hui, > > On Tue, January 27, 2015 13:32, Xinchen Hui wrote: > > Hey: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Anatol Belski <anatol....@belski.net> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> On Mon, January 19, 2015 18:04, Anatol Belski wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I think the research on > >>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/removal_of_dead_sapis_and_exts is now far > >>> enough to be discussed. > >>> > >>> So far I only could not test sapi/nsapi because it needs a > >>> SunOs/IPlanet. > >>> But independent from that, it'd make sense someone to recheck my > >>> perceptions, or just the areas one is interested in. > >>> > >>> Also hereby I'm calling the authors/maintainers of the corresponding > >>> units to give the info about their intentions. > >>> > >>> Lets think about it, anyway. Maybe I've missed some extension yet, > >>> then that were a chance to add it to the RFC. > >>> > >> > >> thanks' for the feedback so far. I've changed the title now to > >> > >> "Removal of dead or not yet PHP7 ported SAPIs and extensions" > >> > >> > >> Also extended the RFC with the information we've got so far - added the > >> extensions suggested by Dmitry and the feedback arrived inbetween. > >> > >> Please check this again, I plan to start the vote on this next week. > >> > > removing extensions is okey, since they can goes to PECL > > > > but for SAPIs, where it can go... :< > > > They wouldn't have to go anywhere if they were supported well. With SAPIs > - many of the servers are either very old or don't support the SAPI > module. Thus porting those SAPIs, even if there were some willing, > wouldn't make not much sense (well, maybe for the learning fun). > > Where should they go - I'd say nowhere. Extensions as well. The removal > should be tagged as any other RFC patch. Then it can be picked from the > tag by the persons ready/willing to maintain them, and taken into PECL or > ported to PHP7 and included again. Depending on the vote results of > course. > > Regards > > Anatol > > what laruence is trying to say that we don't really have a syberia for SAPIs as we have for exts(pecl), but given how these SAPIs are not maintained/compatible with PHP7, I don't think that it is a blocker problem. just maybe something we could improve with the future (would also make it easier to develop SAPIs supporting multiple php versions for example opcache and phpdbg, currently those are a bit PITA for the maintainers). -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
