just change your vote. I just did it. :) Even if ArrayAccess worked not by design, it's going to be a big compatibility issue, removing it. Strings support would work for free.
Thanks. Dmitry, On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > > On 26 Sep 2014, at 11:11, Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So, just to clarify: If we vote to "remove string handling in all cases" > > does that also mean that we "remove ArrayAccess support in all cases"? If > > so, could the RFC please explicitly mention that? > > I myself would be in favour of removing string support, but I don’t want > to remove ArrayAccess. There’s no good reason to get rid of it. > -- > Andrea Faulds > http://ajf.me/ > > > > >
