On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Xinchen Hui <larue...@php.net> wrote: > Hey: > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com> wrote: >> I told it doesn't support strings and objects because it was designed this >> way. >> I don't know who and when did it. >> >> It's not complicated to change it in any way. >> The question which way is better, and it's the reason of voting. >> >> I would prefer not to extend list() to support strings, but in case >> "enabling" would win, I'll make it. >> >> Thanks. Dmitry. >> > I am working what should we do if none side get 2/3 votes? worrying
> it seems it is going there :< > > thanks >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> > It was on design. list() was intended to support plain arrays only. >>> >>> I'm not sure I'm getting this point - why list($a, $b) = $foo is not >>> just translated as $a = $foo[0], $b = $foo[1], etc.? Is it hard to make >>> it work that way? >>> >>> -- >>> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect >>> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ >>> > > > > -- > Xinchen Hui > @Laruence > http://www.laruence.com/ -- Xinchen Hui @Laruence http://www.laruence.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
