When I started this RFC I didn't thought about objects. Actually, they are handled with the same inconsistency problem.
Nikita, feel free to add this note to RFC. May be it'll change mind of some voters :) also add a link to your patch. Thanks. Dmitry. On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com> wrote: > >> It was on design. list() was intended to support plain arrays only. >> >> Thanks. Dmitry. >> > > So, just to clarify: If we vote to "remove string handling in all cases" > does that also mean that we "remove ArrayAccess support in all cases"? If > so, could the RFC please explicitly mention that? > > Nikita >
