hi, On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > Hi! > >> I'd to disagree. Besides the lack of testing (openssl is stable, or do >> we begin to say feature a is not and feature b is beta but everything >> else is stable?), the nightmare about what is available in which >> version is really not what we should do. > > Where's the "nightmare"? Each function is tagged with available version. > Waiting for several years for a new function is not a good idea. > >> php-next will be in a year, openssl can be released in pecl as well. >> There are many requests supporting this idea, incl. from <5.5 users, >> incl. 5.3. > > "Can be released" and actually released are two very different things. > If we have somebody who commits to actually releasing it, with time > table, etc. that would be different story.
Not really, features freeze means features free, not less not much. We can't keep adding things endlessly and expect a release in a foreseeable period. > Even then, with your model it > means we'd be re-releasing every extension as PECL... Those with interest to have them in PECL. It works very well for some extensions already. And it is not my model :) Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
