Hi! > I'd to disagree. Besides the lack of testing (openssl is stable, or do > we begin to say feature a is not and feature b is beta but everything > else is stable?), the nightmare about what is available in which > version is really not what we should do.
Where's the "nightmare"? Each function is tagged with available version. Waiting for several years for a new function is not a good idea. > php-next will be in a year, openssl can be released in pecl as well. > There are many requests supporting this idea, incl. from <5.5 users, > incl. 5.3. "Can be released" and actually released are two very different things. If we have somebody who commits to actually releasing it, with time table, etc. that would be different story. Even then, with your model it means we'd be re-releasing every extension as PECL... -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
