hi Gustavo, On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Gustavo Lopes <glo...@nebm.ist.utl.pt> wrote: > Em Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:13:23 +0200, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> > escreveu: > > >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> wrote: >>> >>> Okay, well... the main pieces of feedback I'd give on it then is to not >>> change the behavior of the '!' modifier. That's bad BC. >> >> >> Fully agreed, if we can avoid the introduction of yet another set of >> #ifdef, then I'm all for it. >> >>> Rather, introduce >>> a new modifier for checking if a parameter was passed. Secondly, make >>> these two separate patches as the new modifier is a separate feature from >>> the single-arg parameter parsing. >> >> >> Agreed here too. >> > > In the interest of a meaningful discussion, please read the proposal and the > rest of the thread (or at least the other responses to the message you were > replying to).
Meaningful discussions include alternative or related areas, and that's where Sarah's post is damned relevant to this thread. And I expressed my support to her comment. Now, I may indeed missed one argument or another is this verbose discussion, but my reply is to Sarah, to give her my support to what she proposed, nothing more, nothing less. However I would strongly suggest you to begin to write a RFC with all details required to take an informed decision. Please use text not source codes links to explain something :). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
