Hi! > support. At least as far as I can tell, people are really interested > in having named parameters, but would rather not have parameter > skipping as implemented.
Which people? So far I've got only one person objecting - namely Gustavo - and he's OK with it with my changes as far as I can see. Do you have any objections to it? Please tell me so I could accommodate them. As for named parameters - it's fine but I don't see how one precludes the other. Named parameters is a big thing, and I don't see anybody working on it or even considering to work on it, so I don't see how you can compare something that is purely theoretical to a feature that has RFC and implementation. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227 -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
