On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > I was just thinking - since we have basically no code relying on this, > why introduce rather artificial concept of "null means no parameter" > (which I'm sure won't work in all cases and won't be expected in all > cases) if we can have perfectly good concept "default means no > parameter" which won't clash with any existing code? I'd just like to point out that I wouldn't bet much on the parameter skipping via default making it in. I don't want to extrapolate too much, but from what I've gathered the feature has rather bad community support. At least as far as I can tell, people are really interested in having named parameters, but would rather not have parameter skipping as implemented.
But that's getting off-topic :/ Nikita -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
