hi Tom, On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Tom Boutell <t...@punkave.com> wrote: > Hmm, but the stat=0 optimization is a major one; a cache that didn't > offer it would be significantly slower in production for those who > know what they're doing, yes?
yes and no, really depends on the codes. However my point was not really about the importance of a given feature but its limitation or drawbacks. stat=0 being the one causing most troubles to lambda users (relative paths usage and the likes). That could be done in a more transparent way, without needing an option to enable this optimization (wincache and other does it). So could be other options, limit them to the critical ones (size of the cache and the likes) and leave the rest to our choices, filling the mass needs before the needs of the 1%. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
