On 2012-07-03 20:49, Arvids Godjuks wrote:
One one side it's good to know i'm not wrong, on the other hand it's sad in this case. Sure about one thing - xcache is worth looking at and may be a better choise than APC and has better potential. One thing sure - I haven't heard anyone complaining about xcache. And heard many complains about APC.
XCache just crashed for me: http://xcache.lighttpd.net/ticket/240 No reproduce case and no idea how to make one - there are megabytes of code involved. We've been using APC for a year and a half after that and I was pretty much happy with it, except it crashed ~once a day with totally obscure backtrace. Not much of a problem, but kind of annoying and APC sources gave me headaches, so I revived eAccelerator instead and made it work with 5.3. With EA there was absolutely no difference in performance comparing to APC and the crashes are gone now. But now I'll have to make EA work with 5.4 and it's interned string hell.., which is quite different story. You might want to look at my EA fork, though: https://github.com/tony2001/eaccelerator/tree/alt -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal --- http://pinba.org - realtime profiling for PHP -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
