One one side it's good to know i'm not wrong, on the other hand it's sad in this case. Sure about one thing - xcache is worth looking at and may be a better choise than APC and has better potential. One thing sure - I haven't heard anyone complaining about xcache. And heard many complains about APC. 03.07.2012 15:17 пользователь "Pierre Joye" <pierre....@gmail.com> написал:
> hi, > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Arvids Godjuks <arvids.godj...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > There are alternative opcode cachers besides APC. For example xcache, for > > me, just works when APC is still catching up. > > I remember someone writing about APC that it is overly compex internally > > and due to that hard to keep up with the changes in the PHP, maybe that > is > > not the case now. > > It is still the case. > > I for one would like to kill all the legacy features or too specific > features which are really unusable by any common developers. > > Other developers may disagree but it makes very hard to maintain APC. > > Cheers, > > > 2012/7/3 Tom Boutell <t...@punkave.com> > > > >> Given the impracticality of using PHP without APC, it would be nice if > >> it were part of the main "if these fail, it's not ready" test suite. > >> But I suppose that's just administering beatings until morale improves > >> (: > > > > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org >
