Hi!
I hope you are keeping in mind our last discussion here. I also like
Yes, I do.
to know what to think about my API changes proposal and the exception usages as it is a relatively important request. Or why are you asking?
I already stated my opinion about exceptions - I consider using them inappropriate in the context of this extension. However, my question was not about redesigning the API, but specifically about names.
I really fear to suddenly see a 1.0.0-stable with none of our requests inside.
That depends on the requests and timeframe for their execution. Since we have mostly done the work that was planned for 1.0, I want to close one question that may change API. Adding features and enhancements is good, but not right now. If you wish, you may document them as feature requests for intl package on pecl too.
Also please find a patch as attachment. It fixes a possible crash in datefmt_create. I have some more to come but I did not get the time to finish.
thanks, applied
The ICU build problem remains as well. I'm not sure it is safe to use 2k3 binaries with php VC6 binaries. I wonder how you built it using vc2005. It fails with all possible errors here. Any trick?
No trick, just checked out the code, put the libs in ../icu, run configure and nmake.
-- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
