On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Antony Dovgal wrote: > On 19.07.2006 18:34, Pierre wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > Many people (incl. php devs) asked me if I can include zip in 5.2.0. > > Ilia thought it was too late in the game and planed to do it in 5.2.1. > > > > I like to have it in, as experimental. > > > > Please note that it intoduces a new class called Zip, but I never saw a > > php zip implementation named Zip. > > > > +1/-1/0? > > -0. > > I would rather move more extensions from core to PECL, than from PECL to core.
I agree here, I am also not sure whether picking the extremely short classname Zip is actually a good thing. Perhaps ZipArchive or ZipFile would be more fitting in the first place, not even considering the issue you can have with other libraries. Complaining against the name "Date" and then just going in another ext with "Zip" just feels wrong. Although the zip ext is a useful thing to have, I think it should stay in PECL as Tony says we're trying to move things to PECL... so a -1 from me on the current proposal to add ext/zip to core with the Zip classname. Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
