loose comments, by no means aimed at Sara (who I happen to hold in high
regard for not only here coding skills but also here general manner)
Sara Golemon wrote:
You and the rest of the people on internals@ are not the masses nor do
they represent them in any way. When a 'non-contributor' dares to
voice an opinion, he's shut up because he's, well, a non-contributor.
He's the one that matters, though, not you.
PHP doesn't need to be a true-democracy (unfocused and dismissive of the
minority), nor an elitist oligarchy (insular and unresponsive to real
needs).
here here. I would add that 'elitist oligarchy' is the worse end of the scale
thought - right now I consider it more of a meritocracy - which is why
IMHO Rasmus is king of the hill (beercan not included).
Yes, the php-general@ masses are the "voice of the people". The
it is, to me anyway, an interesting fact that Rasmus Lerdorf is the only
core/dev
guy/girl that is active (he posts killer stuff on a regular basis) -
that is one thing that really strengthens any arguments he brings to the table
IMHO, he actually talks to us mere mortals, and tries to guide us to better
ways...
I assume that tha ammount of stuff he reads on generals also gives him alot of
insight into the 'state of the nation'.
I certainly don't see any Zend guys in there getting their hands dirty
and being proactive with the so called 'masses' - but Zend (I assume that
Zeev's comments, in particular, can be, at least partially, construed as
being conform to Zend corporate thinking regarding php development) seems
to wave the 'don't upset the masses flag' quite hard.
unwashed majority of the masses want simplicity and constancy, and it's
important that they be provided with such. But there's also that
marginalized minority of *good* scripters out there who will ultimately
outgrow PHP because it doesn't offer the level of professional internal
consistency they're looking for.
I would quitely consider myself just good enough to fall in the *good*
category...
I see it as my responsibility to drag the 'unwashed masses' kicking and
screaming
to a higher skill level - because mostly I don't want to be put into a
situation where I outgrow php - I love it too much.
I field quite a lot of 'dumb' questions at generals@ - always with an eye to
passing on good practice basics (stuff you guys recommend, etc) in so far
as I am capable - there are plenty like me out there. (number on the list of
things that noobs are told not to do is use register_globals and
magic_quotes_gpc)
personally I think its fantastic that you all are looking far ahead and
trying to plan/decide/figure out where its all going - especially in such an
open manner - I still think php is great, and trust it will become greater still
(not just the version number ;-)
Kinds Regards,
Jochem Maas
It's our responsibilities, as contributors, maintainers, and those
merely voicing concerns in open forum to consider all of the masses
(unwashed and otherwise) when making decisions of internal focus.
I appreciate that the "WishList" is long and aggressive. It's also not
a binary image. Let's spread it all out on the table and compare what's
good and not-so-good about it.
The masses deserve that consideration.
-Sara
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
