On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 16:01, Guilliam Xavier <guilliam.xav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 4:38 PM Levi Morrison <levi.morri...@datadoghq.com > > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 9:13 AM Guilliam Xavier > > <guilliam.xav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 3:06 PM Aaron Piotrowski <aa...@trowski.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mar 19, 2021, at 5:47 PM, Levi Morrison < > > levi.morri...@datadoghq.com> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 3:54 PM Niklas Keller <m...@kelunik.com > > <mailto:m...@kelunik.com>> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> Hey Levi, > > >> >> > > >> >>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:40 PM Aaron Piotrowski < > aa...@trowski.com> > > wrote: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Greetings everyone! > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> The vote has started on the fiber RFC: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fibers <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fibers> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Voting will run through March 22nd. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Cheers, > > >> >>>> Aaron Piotrowski > > >> >>> > > >> >>> This is selfish, but I would like to kindly request lengthening > the > > >> >>> voting window to allow me more time to play with it. I feel like I > > >> >>> can't vote "yes" on something like this without more experience > with > > >> >>> it (which is why I currently have voted "no"). I hope others would > > >> >>> play with it more as well if we had more time. Any objections? > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> How much time do you think you need? > > >> > > > >> > Another week seems reasonable; enough time to evaluate it more > > >> > thoroughly but not delay things seriously. > > >> > > >> This is fine with me. Let's extend voting for about another week, > > ending on 3/28 at about 11 PM EDT. > > > > > > > > > I'm afraid you can't: from https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting#voting > > > > > > > A valid voting period must be declared when voting is started and > must > > not be changed during the vote. > > > > > > (Not that I care personally, but you would take the risk of the vote > > being invalidated...) > > > > > > -- > > > Guilliam Xavier > > > > We should dig through the history, because the line before that is in > > conflict: > > > > > Votes should be open for two weeks at minimum, at the authors > discretion > > this may be extended, for example during holiday periods. > > > A valid voting period must be declared when voting is started and must > > not be changed during the vote. > > > > The history is <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abolish-short-votes>, but I don't > think it conflicts: to my understanding, what "may be extended" is the > chosen duration vs the minimum duration (e.g. the author can chose to open > a vote for an "extended" 4-weeks period instead of 2-weeks), and that > choice must be set before starting. > > Arguably the wording is maybe not the clearest, but there's also this from > < > https://externals.io/message/104860>: > > >> +1, but it should probably be possible to extend the voting period once > started, but not shorten it. This allows for extension during holidays in > case the author didn't think about that when starting the vote. > > > > Allowing the extension of voting leaves us open to someone extending the > voting period simply because they don't feel like they have the result they > wanted. > > Anyway I just wanted to warn (it would be a shame to see the vote result > being debated after an extra week), but that may be OK to the "deciders". > > Regards, > > -- > Guilliam Xavier >
