On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 9:55 AM Rowan Tommins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 22/03/2021 15:38, Levi Morrison via internals wrote: > > We should dig through the history, because the line before that is in > > conflict: > > > >> Votes should be open for two weeks at minimum, at the authors discretion > >> this may be extended, for example during holiday periods. > >> A valid voting period must be declared when voting is started and must not > >> be changed during the vote. > > > I don't think there's a conflict there; there's two separate requirements: > > * The duration must be at least two weeks, but may be longer. > * The duration must be specified before the vote starts. > > > The phrase "may be extended" is referring to *who* can make the > decision, not *when* they can make it. > > > Regards, > > -- > Rowan Tommins > [IMSoP] > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php >
I disagree that it is unambiguous. You missed the important part (to me, at least), though: what is the history for this edit? Why was it made? I do not recall discussing this formally at any point (but of course, I may have missed it or forgot). Quick check on version history says 2 years ago. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
