> > >> I hope others would > >> play with it more as well if we had more time. Any objections? > > > > Yes, I object. > > > > You've been around PHP internals long enough to see the drama has > > occurred on other RFCs where people have been > > cajoled/pressured/threatened to either suspend votes or withdraw RFCs. > > > > Although this RFC is reasonably free from drama, I think it was wrong > > for you to ask for an extension regardless of the current voting. Not > > only is it improper on its face, but it sets a bad precedent for more > > drama filled RFCs. > > > > cheers > > Dan > > Ack > > > > btw I would prefer that all RFC votes were longer (e.g. 4 weeks for > > all decisions that don't have an external time constraint), but > > changing the end time during the vote is bogus. > > I agree with Dan. Also, there was plenty of discussion time for this > RFC. It’s not like it was rushed. >
Hey all, given the wording in the voting rules, the fact that the RFC hasn't been edited to include the new end date, and due to the objections, I think the best way forward is closing the voting on the RFC soon. Given no timezone is mentioned in the RFC, we can probably go with either UTC or UTC-12. We'll close the vote after UTC-12 passed. Please create a new thread for discussions about the voting rules in general that aren't specific for this RFC to keep this thread focused. Thanks, Niklas
