> On Feb 20, 2020, at 18:42, Mike Schinkel <m...@newclarity.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Feb 20, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Paul M. Jones <pmjo...@pmjones.io> wrote:
>> 
>> One of the "open questions" on this RFC is: are the class names 
>> ServerRequest, ServerResponse, and ServerResponseSender "good enough" for 
>> our purposes, or are there names that are "better" in some qualitative way?
>> 
>> Having said that, would something like, say, RequestContext and 
>> ResponseBuffer (with ResponseSender) be "better" somehow? Or perhaps some 
>> other names? Or are readers here satisfied that the existing names are 
>> sufficient?
> 
> 
> I would pick the latter.  They are — to me — more descriptive of actually 
> what they are accomplishing than the former.

Thanks for that.  As it hasn't seemed to pique anyone else's interest, maybe I 
will add this as a secondary vote, conditional on the primary one passing.


-- 
Paul M. Jones
pmjo...@pmjones.io
http://paul-m-jones.com

Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP
https://leanpub.com/mlaphp

Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP
https://leanpub.com/sn1php

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to