> On Feb 20, 2020, at 18:42, Mike Schinkel <m...@newclarity.net> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 20, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Paul M. Jones <pmjo...@pmjones.io> wrote:
>>
>> One of the "open questions" on this RFC is: are the class names
>> ServerRequest, ServerResponse, and ServerResponseSender "good enough" for
>> our purposes, or are there names that are "better" in some qualitative way?
>>
>> Having said that, would something like, say, RequestContext and
>> ResponseBuffer (with ResponseSender) be "better" somehow? Or perhaps some
>> other names? Or are readers here satisfied that the existing names are
>> sufficient?
>
>
> I would pick the latter. They are — to me — more descriptive of actually
> what they are accomplishing than the former.
Thanks for that. As it hasn't seemed to pique anyone else's interest, maybe I
will add this as a secondary vote, conditional on the primary one passing.
--
Paul M. Jones
pmjo...@pmjones.io
http://paul-m-jones.com
Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP
https://leanpub.com/mlaphp
Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP
https://leanpub.com/sn1php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php