Hi all, One of the "open questions" on this RFC is: are the class names ServerRequest, ServerResponse, and ServerResponseSender "good enough" for our purposes, or are there names that are "better" in some qualitative way?
The original thought was Request and Response, but I thought it might be too easy to think of them as client-related, rather than server-related. Then I tried PhpRequest and PhpResponse, but having "PHP" in the name seemed unnecessary, as this is PHP after all. I settled on ServerRequest and ServerResponse to point out that they are server-related. Having said that, would something like, say, RequestContext and ResponseBuffer (with ResponseSender) be "better" somehow? Or perhaps some other names? Or are readers here satisfied that the existing names are sufficient? And thanks to the many folks here who have already provided such valuable feedback! -- Paul M. Jones pmjo...@pmjones.io http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP https://leanpub.com/mlaphp Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP https://leanpub.com/sn1php -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
