On 03/19/2015 01:57 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 13:53 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On 03/17/2015 02:40 AM, Imre Deak wrote:
>>> The checks for PLL enabled state on CPU ports are valid only on GMCH
>>> platforms but atm we'd also call them on non-PCH-split/non-GMCH
>>> platforms like BXT, triggering false warnings. Until the proper check is
>>> implented for these platforms simply disable the check.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>>> index c060496..ff26752 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>>> @@ -2099,7 +2099,7 @@ static void intel_enable_pipe(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>>>      * a plane.  On ILK+ the pipe PLLs are integrated, so we don't
>>>      * need the check.
>>>      */
>>> -   if (!HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv->dev))
>>> +   if (HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY(dev_priv->dev))
>>>             if (intel_pipe_has_type(crtc, INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI))
>>>                     assert_dsi_pll_enabled(dev_priv);
>>>             else
>>> @@ -4376,7 +4376,7 @@ static void intel_crtc_load_lut(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>>>     if (!crtc->state->enable || !intel_crtc->active)
>>>             return;
>>>  
>>> -   if (!HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv->dev)) {
>>> +   if (HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY(dev_priv->dev)) {
>>>             if (intel_pipe_has_type(intel_crtc, INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI))
>>>                     assert_dsi_pll_enabled(dev_priv);
>>>             else
>>>
>>
>> It looks like we're doing dsi calls, so this must at least apply to BYT,
>> right?  We might need more granularity here...
> 
> Yea, but VLV is covered by the GMCH check.

Ah ok, in that case it's fine.

Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to