On Thu, 2025-06-26 at 11:20 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> From: Imre Deak <imre.d...@gmail.com>
> 
> Read and ack the sink count, sink device and link service IRQs for SST
> the same way this is done for MST, the read/ack happening in separate
> steps via an ESI (Event Status Indicator) vector.
> 
> The above way is more efficient, since on newer (DPCD_REV >= 1.2) sinks
> the DP_SINK_COUNT_ESI..DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0 registers can be
> read out in one AUX transaction - and the 3 last one written in one
> transaction. Also this allows sharing more of the SST and MST IRQ
> handling code (done as a follow-up).
> 
> For now keep the current behavior of always reading the legacy
> DP_SINK_COUNT, DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR registers and not reading
> the DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI1 register.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 132 +++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 2ba4a810f22c2..2e6ed7d2a64a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4573,6 +4573,70 @@ static bool intel_dp_ack_sink_irq_esi(struct intel_dp 
> *intel_dp, u8 esi[4])
>       return false;
>  }
>  
> +static bool intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi_sst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 
> esi[4])
> +{
> +     memset(esi, 0, 4);
> +
> +     /*
> +      * TODO: For DP_DPCD_REV >= 0x12 read
> +      * DP_SINK_COUNT_ESI and DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0.
> +      */
> +     if (drm_dp_dpcd_read_data(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SINK_COUNT, esi, 2) != 0)
> +             return false;
> +
> +     if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_12)
> +             return true;
> +
> +     /* TODO: Read DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI1 as well */
> +     if (drm_dp_dpcd_read_byte(&intel_dp->aux, 
> DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, &esi[3]) != 0)
> +             return false;
> +
> +     return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool intel_dp_ack_sink_irq_esi_sst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 
> esi[4])
> +{
> +     /*
> +      * TODO: For DP_DPCD_REV >= 0x12 write
> +      * DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0
> +      */
> +     if (drm_dp_dpcd_write_byte(&intel_dp->aux, 
> DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR, esi[1]) != 0)
> +             return false;
> +
> +     if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_12)
> +             return true;
> +
> +     /* TODO: Read DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI1 as well */
> +     if (drm_dp_dpcd_write_byte(&intel_dp->aux, 
> DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, esi[3]) != 0)
> +             return false;
> +
> +     return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool intel_dp_get_and_ack_sink_irq_esi_sst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, 
> u8 esi[4])
> +{
> +     struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> +     struct intel_connector *connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
> +     struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base;
> +
> +     if (!intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi_sst(intel_dp, esi))
> +             return false;
> +
> +     drm_dbg_kms(display->drm,
> +                 "[CONNECTOR:%d:%s][ENCODER:%d:%s] DPRX ESI: %4ph\n",
> +                 connector->base.base.id, connector->base.name,
> +                 encoder->base.base.id, encoder->base.name,
> +                 esi);
> +
> +     if (mem_is_zero(&esi[1], 3))
> +             return true;
> +
> +     if (!intel_dp_ack_sink_irq_esi_sst(intel_dp, esi))
> +             return false;
> +
> +     return true;
> +}
> +

Again, I think it's better to propagate the error than to swallow it
and return a bool.

Other than that, it looks good to me.  So if you agree with this
change:

Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coe...@tintel.com>

--
Cheers,
Luca.

> @@ -5393,27 +5457,6 @@ void intel_dp_check_link_state(struct intel_dp 
> *intel_dp)
>       intel_encoder_link_check_queue_work(encoder, 0);
>  }
>  
> -static bool intel_dp_get_and_ack_device_service_irq(struct intel_dp 
> *intel_dp, u8 *irq_mask)
> -{
> -     u8 val;
> -
> -     *irq_mask = 0;
> -
> -     if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
> -                           DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR, &val) != 1)
> -             return false;
> -
> -     if (!val)
> -             return true;
> -
> -     if (drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR, 
> val) != 1)
> -             return false;
> -
> -     *irq_mask = val;
> -
> -     return true;
> -}
> -
>  static void intel_dp_handle_device_service_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 
> irq_mask)
>  {
>       struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> @@ -5428,31 +5471,6 @@ static void intel_dp_handle_device_service_irq(struct 
> intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 irq
>               drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Sink specific irq unhandled\n");
>  }
>  
> -static bool intel_dp_get_and_ack_link_service_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, 
> u8 *irq_mask)
> -{
> -     u8 val;
> -
> -     *irq_mask = 0;
> -
> -     if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_12)
> -             return true;
> -
> -     if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux,
> -                           DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, &val) != 1)
> -             return false;
> -
> -     if (!val)
> -             return true;
> -
> -     if (drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux,
> -                            DP_LINK_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR_ESI0, val) != 1)
> -             return false;
> -
> -     *irq_mask = val;
> -
> -     return true;
> -}
> -
>  static bool intel_dp_handle_link_service_irq(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, u8 
> irq_mask)
>  {
>       struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> @@ -5489,30 +5507,26 @@ static bool
>  intel_dp_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
>       bool reprobe_needed = false;
> -     u8 irq_mask;
> +     u8 esi[4] = {};
>  
>       intel_dp_test_reset(intel_dp);
>  
> +     if (!intel_dp_get_and_ack_sink_irq_esi_sst(intel_dp, esi))
> +             return false;
> +
>       /*
> -      * Now read the DPCD to see if it's actually running
>        * If the current value of sink count doesn't match with
> -      * the value that was stored earlier or dpcd read failed
> -      * we need to do full detection
> +      * the value that was stored earlier we need to do full
> +      * detection.
>        */
>       if (intel_dp_has_sink_count(intel_dp) &&
> -         drm_dp_read_sink_count(&intel_dp->aux) != intel_dp->sink_count)
> +         DP_GET_SINK_COUNT(esi[0]) != intel_dp->sink_count)
>               /* No need to proceed if we are going to do full detect */
>               return false;
>  
> -     if (!intel_dp_get_and_ack_device_service_irq(intel_dp, &irq_mask))
> -             return false;
> +     intel_dp_handle_device_service_irq(intel_dp, esi[1]);
>  
> -     intel_dp_handle_device_service_irq(intel_dp, irq_mask);
> -
> -     if (!intel_dp_get_and_ack_link_service_irq(intel_dp, &irq_mask))
> -             return false;
> -
> -     if (intel_dp_handle_link_service_irq(intel_dp, irq_mask))
> +     if (intel_dp_handle_link_service_irq(intel_dp, esi[3]))
>               reprobe_needed = true;
>  
>       /* Handle CEC interrupts, if any */

Reply via email to