> -----Original Message----- > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Suraj > Kandpal > Sent: 15 November 2024 21:31 > To: intel...@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Govindapillai, Vinod <vinod.govindapil...@intel.com>; Nikula, Jani > <jani.nik...@intel.com>; Kandpal, Suraj <suraj.kand...@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/wm: Initialize max_latency variable to > appropriate value > > Initialize max_latency variable to LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK which helps to > eliminate the else block and make the whole code a lot cleaner. > While we are at it group the initialized variable together. I suggest not to combine your functional change with other refactoring. Rest other suggested changes from previous revision looks good. > > Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kand...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 6 +----- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c > index 1a4c1fa24820..a49e8915346e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c > @@ -2857,9 +2857,8 @@ static int skl_wm_add_affected_planes(struct > intel_atomic_state *state, static void skl_program_dpkgc_latency(struct > drm_i915_private *i915, bool enable_dpkgc) { > - u32 max_latency = 0; > + u32 max_latency = LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK, added_wake_time = > 0; > u32 clear = 0, val = 0; > - u32 added_wake_time = 0; > > if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) < 20) > return; > @@ -2870,9 +2869,6 @@ skl_program_dpkgc_latency(struct > drm_i915_private *i915, bool enable_dpkgc) > max_latency = LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK; > added_wake_time = DSB_EXE_TIME + > i915->display.sagv.block_time_us; > - } else { > - max_latency = LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK; > - added_wake_time = 0; > } > > clear |= LNL_ADDED_WAKE_TIME_MASK | > LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK; > -- > 2.34.1
RE: [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/wm: Initialize max_latency variable to appropriate value
Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar Mon, 02 Dec 2024 01:15:46 -0800
- RE: [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/display: Refact... Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
- [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/wm: Rename enable_dpkgc ... Suraj Kandpal
- RE: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/wm: Rename enab... Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
- RE: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/wm: Rename ... Kandpal, Suraj
- RE: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/wm: Rename ... Kandpal, Suraj
- [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/wm: Modify latency progr... Suraj Kandpal
- RE: [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/wm: Modify late... Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
- RE: [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/wm: Modify ... Kandpal, Suraj
- ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with... Patchwork
- ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting w... Patchwork
- RE: [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/wm: Initialize max_l... Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
- RE: [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/wm: Initialize ... Kandpal, Suraj
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/wm: Initialize max_l... Jani Nikula
- [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/wm: Initialize max_laten... Suraj Kandpal
- [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/wm: Refactor dpkgc ... Suraj Kandpal
- RE: [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/wm: Refacto... Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
- [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/wm: Use intel_displ... Suraj Kandpal
- [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/wm: Modify latency ... Suraj Kandpal
- RE: [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/wm: Modify ... Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
- [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/wm: Club the initia... Suraj Kandpal
- RE: [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/wm: Club th... Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar