On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 06:17:28PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 08:45:31AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 07:28:10PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com > > wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > > > > > > Use two-dimensional arrays and named initializers to make the > > > overlay filter coefficient tables easier to parse for humans. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > > > > Spot checking didn't reveal any typos. I presume that since they are u16 > > array of arrays, gcc is not adding any padding between rows? > > Didn't see any. I suppose we could > > BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(y_static_hcoeffs) != N_PHASES * N_HORIZ_Y_TAPS * 2); > BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(uv_static_hcoeffs) != N_PHASES * N_HORIZ_UV_TAPS * 2); > > for extra paranoia?
I don't think it matters. Maybe a __packed and just leave it to gcc's whims? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
